35mm Camera, Main Parts Which Is A Better 35mm SLR - Nikon FE2 Or Pentax K1000?

Which is a better 35mm SLR - Nikon FE2 or Pentax K1000? - 35mm camera, main parts

I want to buy a 35mm SLR for my second year at UNI, perhaps up to 100 pounds, a second chamber of the hand in good condition. I have the K1000 for my first year. What are the main differences in these cameras and, if necessary, would you recommend?
Thank you in advance.

7 comments:

FotoZ 4 FX said...

In fact, both the cameras you mention are premium choices, but as ordinary mortals current grade lenses and the D40 has no place in the K1000, if you do buy an adapter for Pentax and Nikon F-mount to attach the space between the lens Change camera and then the focal length to a certain extent. The downside of this is multiple ... measure changes in the ability to collect light degraded to its purpose (a little, but it does), and I do not really go to because I do not recommend changing the system of Pentax.

Nikon makes an adapter for other systems because it is a business decision (and a scholar, in my opinion) is not promoting the deterioration of function in the best interest of photography. Other companies such as Canon, Pentax and others do, however, that the adapter for Nikon lenses. The reason is obvious.

Anyway ... the DX lenses are on the electronic FE2 be mounted, but manual operation must be possible without some underground elementstion, as you can see F / Stop through the viewfinder or to receive a recommended shutter / exposure value. They are likely to contribute to an incident meter with you to ensure that the correct exposure to know (something like) the photo. I am with my glasses.

I have many goals, and they all work between my film and digital SLR cameras in varying degree. Tickled Pink (and you can imagine my excitement) to discover my EDIF 600-D f / 4 Nikkor AF with my digital D100. This is very expensive, and I was very happy to know that I use it with my camera, because he is a target age of cinema.

I recommend the FE2.
.

FotoZ 4 FX said...

In fact, both the cameras you mention are premium choices, but as ordinary mortals current grade lenses and the D40 has no place in the K1000, if you do buy an adapter for Pentax and Nikon F-mount to attach the space between the lens Change camera and then the focal length to a certain extent. The downside of this is multiple ... measure changes in the ability to collect light degraded to its purpose (a little, but it does), and I do not really go to because I do not recommend changing the system of Pentax.

Nikon makes an adapter for other systems because it is a business decision (and a scholar, in my opinion) is not promoting the deterioration of function in the best interest of photography. Other companies such as Canon, Pentax and others do, however, that the adapter for Nikon lenses. The reason is obvious.

Anyway ... the DX lenses are on the electronic FE2 be mounted, but manual operation must be possible without some underground elementstion, as you can see F / Stop through the viewfinder or to receive a recommended shutter / exposure value. They are likely to contribute to an incident meter with you to ensure that the correct exposure to know (something like) the photo. I am with my glasses.

I have many goals, and they all work between my film and digital SLR cameras in varying degree. Tickled Pink (and you can imagine my excitement) to discover my EDIF 600-D f / 4 Nikkor AF with my digital D100. This is very expensive, and I was very happy to know that I use it with my camera, because he is a target age of cinema.

I recommend the FE2.
.

FotoZ 4 FX said...

In fact, both the cameras you mention are premium choices, but as ordinary mortals current grade lenses and the D40 has no place in the K1000, if you do buy an adapter for Pentax and Nikon F-mount to attach the space between the lens Change camera and then the focal length to a certain extent. The downside of this is multiple ... measure changes in the ability to collect light degraded to its purpose (a little, but it does), and I do not really go to because I do not recommend changing the system of Pentax.

Nikon makes an adapter for other systems because it is a business decision (and a scholar, in my opinion) is not promoting the deterioration of function in the best interest of photography. Other companies such as Canon, Pentax and others do, however, that the adapter for Nikon lenses. The reason is obvious.

Anyway ... the DX lenses are on the electronic FE2 be mounted, but manual operation must be possible without some underground elementstion, as you can see F / Stop through the viewfinder or to receive a recommended shutter / exposure value. They are likely to contribute to an incident meter with you to ensure that the correct exposure to know (something like) the photo. I am with my glasses.

I have many goals, and they all work between my film and digital SLR cameras in varying degree. Tickled Pink (and you can imagine my excitement) to discover my EDIF 600-D f / 4 Nikkor AF with my digital D100. This is very expensive, and I was very happy to know that I use it with my camera, because he is a target age of cinema.

I recommend the FE2.
.

FotoZ 4 FX said...

In fact, both the cameras you mention are premium choices, but as ordinary mortals current grade lenses and the D40 has no place in the K1000, if you do buy an adapter for Pentax and Nikon F-mount to attach the space between the lens Change camera and then the focal length to a certain extent. The downside of this is multiple ... measure changes in the ability to collect light degraded to its purpose (a little, but it does), and I do not really go to because I do not recommend changing the system of Pentax.

Nikon makes an adapter for other systems because it is a business decision (and a scholar, in my opinion) is not promoting the deterioration of function in the best interest of photography. Other companies such as Canon, Pentax and others do, however, that the adapter for Nikon lenses. The reason is obvious.

Anyway ... the DX lenses are on the electronic FE2 be mounted, but manual operation must be possible without some underground elementstion, as you can see F / Stop through the viewfinder or to receive a recommended shutter / exposure value. They are likely to contribute to an incident meter with you to ensure that the correct exposure to know (something like) the photo. I am with my glasses.

I have many goals, and they all work between my film and digital SLR cameras in varying degree. Tickled Pink (and you can imagine my excitement) to discover my EDIF 600-D f / 4 Nikkor AF with my digital D100. This is very expensive, and I was very happy to know that I use it with my camera, because he is a target age of cinema.

I recommend the FE2.
.

Pylon said...

To add to believe Mere Mortal II G lenses do not work in FE2. Basically any purpose without an aperture ring will not work. The problem is the last of lenses for digital cameras are G lenses, including D40 Kit 18-55 lens.

And Fotofan85:
I started in digital, and are used for many years. I recently the film because it is something serious shortage of digital photography for the film in comparison ... really do not know how to describe it. But shoot my first roll Fujifilm Velvia 100th

Brian A said...

You can not go wrong with a Canon, $ $ $ = = quality investments.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?i ...

FotoFan8... said...

I am not very fond of movies, takes a long time ... I am a digital girl, I use the Canon and Nikon digital XSI are also good. But if you ask the two I would go with the Nikon for sure. Nikon has a better reliability, and can still go digital in a movie or better (at least) ...

Post a Comment